The U.S. population was 276.1 million in 1998, per the U.S. Census Bureau and the World Bank. Adjusting for illegal immigration, the U.S. population in 2024 was about 330 million people (not adjusting for immigration, per the Census Bureau, it stood at about 340.1 million). So, despite an increase of 64 million people, the production of manufactured housing has dropped over 70 percent. With homelessness rising, with debts and deficits high and going higher, there is a need to fix affordable housing which simply can’t be done mathematically with today’s technology without millions of more HUD Code manufactured homes. With that brief backdrop, Part I of this report is the latest monthly official statistics on HUD Code manufactured home production for December 2024 and thus for the cumulative totals for 2024. Part II is additional information with a focused analysis and commentary.
Part I – Manufactured Home Industry Production on Positive Trajectory Entering Second Trump Term says Manufactured Housing Association for Regulatory Reform (MHARR) – U.S. Total for 2024
Washington, D.C., February 3, 2025 – The Manufactured Housing Association for Regulatory Reform (MHARR) reports that according to official statistics compiled on behalf of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), HUD Code manufactured housing industry year-over-year production increased in December 2024. Just-released statistics indicate that HUD Code manufacturers produced 7,078 new homes in December 2024, an 11.2% increase over the 6,360 new HUD Code homes produced in December 2023. Cumulative production for 2024 thus totals 103,314 homes, a 15.8% increase over the 89,169 HUD Code homes produced during 2023.
A further analysis of the official industry statistics shows that the top ten shipment states from January 2023 — with monthly, cumulative, current reporting year (2024) and prior year (2023) shipments per category as indicated — are:
The December 2024 statistics result in no changes to the cumulative top-ten list.
While the increase in production of new HUD Code homes reflected in the 2024 statistics is an encouraging turn-around from 2023, and is more consistent with production levels above the 100,000-home benchmark noted in 2021 and 2022, it still pales in comparison with the demand (and need) for affordable starter homes in the United States and the production levels in the hundreds-of-thousands of homes that the industry should be achieving. As MHARR has again emphasized most recently in a communication to HUD Secretary-Nominee Scott Turner, this differential, between demand, need and production, is fundamentally a function of three significant bottlenecks that have undermined the availability and utilization of HUD Code manufactured homes, i.e., discriminatory zoning exclusion, the failure of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to implement the statutory Duty to Serve for the industry’s dominant chattel lending sector, and looming draconian federal energy regulation. In a second Trump Administration, these bottlenecks should – and must be removed – and the industry cannot afford to waste its renewed opportunity to do so. Rather, now is the time to take aggressive action to eliminate these bottlenecks once and for all, while preserving the benefits of reasonable federal regulation, and expanding the affordable, mainstream manufactured housing industry.
The Manufactured Housing Association for Regulatory Reform is a Washington, D.C.- based national trade association representing the views and interests of independent producers of federally-regulated manufactured housing.
— 30 —
Part II – Additional Information with More MHProNews Analysis and Commentary
In no particular order of importance are the following.
“When you want to help people, you tell them the truth.
When you want to help yourself, you tell them what they want to hear.”
– Thomas Sowell
“The puzzle is why there’s so little (manufactured housing) being shipped
when it’s a much better product than it used to be.”
– Laurie Goodman, Urban Institute fellow
1) Updated based on official sources data from MHProNews/MHLivingNews production totals from 1995-2024.
Year | New Manufactured Home (MH) Production |
1995 | 344,930 |
1996 | 363,345 |
1997 | 353,686 |
1998 | 373,143 |
1999 | 348,075 |
2000 | 250,366 |
2001 | 193,120 |
2002 | 165,489 |
2003 | 130,815 |
2004 | 130,748 |
2005 | 146,881 |
2006 | 117,373 |
2007 | 95,752 |
2008 | 81,457 |
2009 | 49,683 |
2010 | 50,056 |
2011 | 51,618 |
2012 | 54,881 |
2013 | 60,228 |
2014 | 64,334 |
2015 | 70,544 |
2016 | 81,136 |
2017 | 92,902 |
2018 | 96,555 |
2019 | 94,615 |
2020 | 94,390 |
2021 | 105,772 |
2022 | 112,882 |
2023 | 89,169 |
2024 | 103,314 |
2) According to a longer interview with then Manufactured Housing Institute (a.k.a.: MHI or “The Institute”) president and CEO Chris Stinebert at this link here by The Wall Street Transcript (TWST) was the following remarks.
Mr. Stinebert: The industry is expected to produce about 130,000 manufactured homes for the 2004 year, which is flat compared to its production of the year before. But we are expecting a healthy increase for 2005 up to between 145,000-150,000 homes.
TWST: Those levels are well below peak.
Mr. Stinebert: Yes. As recently as 1998, the industry produced 375,000 homes. [MHProNews note: the actual total for 1998 was 373,143].
TWST: Why the change? What went on to bring this number down so far?
Mr. Stinebert: We over-produced and built up inventory in the late 1990s. Retailers were encouraged to expand their stock of homes at the sales centers, creating sales for the manufacturers, while home sales to consumers did not keep pace. That was one factor. A second factor is that a lot of the homes that sold to individuals who could not afford them. Loose underwriting, lenient loan terms, and fraud lead to increased delinquencies and defaults. Repossessions flooded the market, directly impacting the severity of recoveries. Numerous lenders exited the industry at both the wholesale and retail markets and those remaining greatly tightened their underwriting requirements. The lending capacity for personal property loans ‘ chattel financing ‘ was severely curtailed. At the same time, the GSEs ‘ Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac ‘ segregated their manufactured housing portfolios and mandated new requirements and restrictive underwriting for conforming home loans. There are other factors that contributed to the recent decline in sales or production but these are the biggest. In the end, it was a combination of ‘perfect storm’ factors that fell upon the industry over a two-year period, and we’re just now starting to emerge as a stronger industry and certainly a smarter one.
TWST: Are all these issues pretty much behind you?
Mr. Stinebert: I would have to say yes. Inventory levels are very good and back to balanced levels. The high level repossessions from loans made during the 1990s, which have plagued the industry, have returned to manageable levels. The performance of loans made over the last several years continues to improve. The underwriting guidelines and terms for financing the homes has been vastly improved to the extent that some feel that there has been an over-reaction and an over-tightening and that some credit-worthy purchasers or customers do not have the ability to purchase a manufactured home but easily qualify for a site-built home. But there are other positive factors as well. …
3) From the 65-page report named below:
Manufactured Housing as a
Community- and Asset-Building
Report to the Ford Foundation by Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation
In collaboration with the
Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University
…are the following pull quotes by authors and topics reviewed.
“Will Manufactured Housing Become Home of First Choice?”
– Freddie Mac 1997 Mortgage Market Trends, pp. 29-33.
- Per a WORD search of the document, the report has 20 uses of the term “perception.”
- There are three uses of the term “stigma.”
One of the efforts to address those image problems was reported as follows.
Fanjoy, Rob
- Manufactured mansion to house first family.
Professional Builder 65(12):50.
Champion Enterprises, Inc., of Auburn Hills, Michigan, donated a three-bedroom, two-bath manufactured home to the Arkansas Governor’s Mansion Association in an effort to raise awareness and change the public’s outdated perceptions of manufactured housing. The home will house Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee and his family while renovations are being done to the mansion. The home, chosen by first lady Janet Huckabee, was specifically designed to fit the needs of the baby-boomer market. Its selling price is $99,000.
Recall that MHProNews has periodically reminded readers of that historic effort involving then Gov. Mike Huckabee, who was named by President Trump to be the U.S. Ambassador to Israel.
No one in manufactured housing industry trade media does history and current events like MHProNews, which may help explain the dominance of our platform over the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) and its apparent trade media allies and bloggers.
Just In: Incoming US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee.
Kilmeade: “Do you believe that a two state solution is the future?”
Huckabee: “No. We have to recognize there was a Palestinian state. It was called Gaza. Look how that turned out.”
— Eyal Yakoby (@EYakoby) January 20, 2025
4) Recall that in 2004-2005 the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) launched and later announced what became known as the Roper Report. It was supposed to address the image/stigma issue. It was supposed to ‘unleash’ potential sales because “perception is reality” according to the late MHI VP Bruce Savage’s remarks on the subject.
5) Also, in the turn-of-the-century timeframe was the MHI touting the potential of manufactured housing to surpass conventional construction. They did so by citing remarks from Eric Belsky, who was previously with the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies (JCHS).
Belsky’s remarks were later scrubbed from the MHI website. Also later scrubbed from the public side of the MHI website was former VP Bruce Savage’s name, former MHI president and CEO Chris Stinebert, and several other MHI presidents/CEOs and VPs.
6) So, despite the downturn, despite the stigma/perception issues, despite the loss of financing when Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac withdrew their support for HUD Code manufactured housing, the industry was nevertheless expected by several researchers to exceed the production of conventional ‘site-built housing. A reasonable researcher ought to wonder: ‘What happened?’
7) In 2000, Warren Buffett led Berkshire Hathaway (BRK) sold off stocks in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
8) In 2002 and 2003, Buffett led Berkshire made its apparent direct foray into manufactured housing by acquiring a stake in Oakwood Homes and buying Clayton Homes and rolling Oakwood into it.
9) Did ex-MHI CEO Stinebert consider those developments in the dramatically diminished manufactured home industry (a.k.a. MHVille) when he told TWST that manufactured housing would recover? Perhaps not.
10) Obviously, these subjects ought to matter to those directly involved in manufactured housing, or perhaps to those involved in affordable housing more broadly. Because it is widely acknowledged in research literature that manufactured homes are an important component to solving the affordable housing crisis.
Manufactured homes are an often overlooked and maligned component of our nation’s housing stock, but these homes are an important source of housing for millions of Americans, especially those with low incomes and in rural areas.
That is the introduction to the “Advocates Guide” report authored by
Doug Ryan, Vice President, Policy
& Applied Research, Prosperity Now;
Lance George, Director of Research
& Information, Housing Assistance
Council; and Maya Hamberg, Lincoln
Institute of Land Policy & I’m HOME Network
found at this link here and shared by the National Low Income Housing Coalition (NLIHC), among others.
These subjects also ought to matter to taxpayers, who are on the hook for the affordable housing crisis costs that include rising homelessness due to the obvious lack of affordable housing.
11) But they also should be of concern to shareholders and regulators charged with oversight of the financial and housing sectors. Why? Because as the National Low Income Housing Coalition (NLIHC), Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (RI-D), and Cavco Industries (CVCO) each observed, the lack of sufficient affordable housing near where it is needed is costing the U.S. economy some $2 trillion dollars annually.
But in a curious development, Cavco – which aptly pointed out that the lack of affordable housing is harming the U.S. economy to the tune of $2 trillion dollars in lost GDP annually – after this publication began to point that out in our reports, Cavco dropped that claim from their investor relations presentation. Note that MHI’s chairman is Cavco CEO William “Bill” Boor. Look at the bottom right of the Cavco IR presentation slide above and the same place in the bottom right of the same Cavco slide some months later below.
13) There is a considerable and growing body of evidence that demonstrates from documents and remarks by MHI members and/or MHI itself that key firms are attempting to keep the industry underperforming. Absent that evidence, one might wonder how it is possible that two good federal laws that favor manufactured housing could possibly be so mismanaged by MHI. MHI leaders are intelligent, sometimes well-educated and experienced. Which is all the more reason why someone should wonder: how is it possible that more than 20 years have elapsed since MHI’s President and CEO Chris Stinebert said the industry was ready to recover and it still has failed to do so? The answer is found in the graphics and remarks uttered by MHI’s own corporate members and leaders linked here (click in a new window to open to a larger size). An even more detailed illustration with more evidence is linked here.
Note that manufactured home industry underperformance tends to foster consolidation.
14) Manufactured housing is slowly but steadily being monopolized due to underperformance of the industry. This oligopoly style of monopolization is also well supported by third-party as well as MHProNews/MHLivingNews research. As former MHI chairman Nathan Smith said.
Again, our thanks to free email subscribers and all readers like you, as well as our tipsters/sources, sponsors and God for making and keeping us the runaway number one source for authentic “News through the lens of manufactured homes and factory-built housing” © where “We Provide, You Decide.” © ## (Affordable housing, manufactured homes, reports, fact-checks, analysis, and commentary. Third-party images or content are provided under fair use guidelines for media.) See Related Reports, further below. Text/image boxes often are hot-linked to other reports that can be access by clicking on them.)
By L.A. “Tony” Kovach – for MHProNews.com.
Tony earned a journalism scholarship and earned numerous awards in history and in manufactured housing.
For example, he earned the prestigious Lottinville Award in history from the University of Oklahoma, where he studied history and business management. He’s a managing member and co-founder of LifeStyle Factory Homes, LLC, the parent company to MHProNews, and MHLivingNews.com.
This article reflects the LLC’s and/or the writer’s position and may or may not reflect the views of sponsors or supporters.
Connect on LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/latonykovach