According to her bio in brief: “Passionate about analyzing economic markets, Alice M. Carter joined THE NORTHERN FORUM with a mission: to make financial concepts accessible to everyone. With over 10 years of experience in economic journalism, she specializes in global economic trends and US financial policies. She firmly believes that a better understanding of the economy is the key to a more informed future.” Carter is also listed as “Editor-in-Chief” for “Economy and Finance” for that publication’s website. Under her The Northern Forum headline: “Mass Deportations Could Worsen the US’s Severe Housing Shortage,” Carter may be thought of as providing a textbook case of paltering, as the facts, evidence, and analysis (FEA) that follows will reflect. In under 750 words, Carter attempts her apparent case that mass deportations of illegal aliens living among us could worsen the “severe” U.S. housing crisis. Among the points Carter never mentions?
- According to a WORD search of her article, the word “million” occurs only once. “Given the country’s need for millions more homes, as various estimates suggest, losing any portion of the workforce responsible for building these homes would only exacerbate the housing crisis.” What is missing in her article, as is show below, is an estimate of how many millions of illegal, undocumented, or whatever term one may want to use to describe those who face mass deportation are living in the U.S. along with how many housing units they occupy.
- It is almost comical, if it were not so tragically misguided, to see Carter cite information that seems to undermine her own argument. Perhaps as a surprise, that includes Carter citing Clayton Homes and the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI), which the later perhaps surprisingly provided a remark that contradicts her headline and summary contention.
- Both artificial intelligences (AI) powered insights from Gemini and Copilot help debunk her claims that losing illegal immigrants will make building homes harder. At best, perhaps, her article is uninformed, lacked sufficient research, overlooked her own internal contradictions, and/or is paltering. At worst, it’s deception and misdirection used to bolster a viewpoint that is demonstrably wrong, as Part II of this article will demonstrate. Whatever the reasons for the apparent weaknesses of her article, her thoughts and statements are provided below in Part I.
In fairness, it may be that Carter has written other articles that are better researched and presented than this one. However, The Northern Forum claims that their work is well researched and reliable. Parts I and II demonstrate the flaws in that claim.
With that tee up, here is the thrust of Carter’s article as published in the Northern Forum on 11.16.2024, provided under fair use guidelines for fisking purposes. Following that, Part III will be our Sunday headline recap for the MHVille week in review.
Part I
Mass Deportations Could Worsen the US’s Severe Housing Shortage
Published by Alice M. Carter | Update on : November 16, 2024
As Donald Trump gears up to assume the presidency and fulfill a major campaign pledge to deport immigrants, a looming question is its potential impact on the real estate market.
There is a nationwide shortage of housing across all types. A primary cause has been the significant drop in new home construction during the Great Recession, which continued to lag for several years afterward.
A large segment of the workforce in the construction industry consists of immigrants. The mass removal of these workers would severely disrupt the sector, in addition to causing profound social and emotional impacts, according to experts and advocates.
Major homebuilders such as Taylor Morrison, NVR Inc., KB Home, and Century Communities Inc. have opted not to comment. Similarly, there was no comment from D.R. Horton, Lennar Corp., PulteGroup Inc., Meritage, or LGI Homes.
Clayton Homes deferred inquiries to the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI), where Dr. Lesli Gooch, the CEO, provided an emailed statement. “MHI is not concerned about President-elect Trump’s intention to uphold the nation’s immigration laws. Our factories and workers adhere to these laws, and we look forward to playing a key role in tackling the national housing shortage,” Gooch stated.
The National Association of Home Builders was another organization willing to comment. “Any large-scale deportation is bound to affect the economy. I believe the construction and housing sectors will experience disproportionately large impacts compared to other industries,” said Ken Wingert, the chief advocacy officer.
“We believe that a thorough and comprehensive approach to immigration reform is necessary and we hope that Congress will address this when they reconvene in January,” Wingert added. “We support efforts to integrate more workers into the workforce to help alleviate the current housing shortage we’re experiencing.”
The association has consistently highlighted the ongoing need for more construction workers. According to a recent report, “the construction sector sees about 723,000 job openings annually.”
The report also reveals that immigrants compose 25% of the overall construction workforce, and nearly one-third of those in construction trades. However, Wingert noted that the association does not have data on how many of these workers are in the country legally.
Legal Status of Workers
Francesc Ortega, an economics professor at Queens College in New York, has devoted years to studying this issue. By analyzing U.S. Census Bureau data within a demographic framework, Ortega estimates that about 15% of construction workers are undocumented.
It’s evident that the significant presence of immigrants, whether documented or not, has helped keep labor costs in construction much lower than they would be with a workforce composed predominantly of native-born workers. According to a recent analysis by the Labor Department, as of 2020, foreign-born workers generally earned less than their native-born counterparts. In the broader economy, immigrants earned about 12% less, but in construction, this disparity widened to 24% less.
“Ideally, the U.S. would maintain an immigration system that is humane and based on rule of law, and an economic system that does not rely on the exploitation of workers,” stated Michael Lukens, executive director of the Amica Center for Immigrant Rights, a national advocacy organization.
The Dire Impact of Mass Deportations on Housing
While it might seem that mass deportations would simply raise costs, research from Ortega and other scholars suggests the issue is more complex.
“In construction, documented and undocumented workers often perform different roles,” explained Ortega. “They complement rather than replace each other.”
This means that if construction companies were to lose their immigrant labor force due to deportations (or preemptive departures), it’s unlikely that native-born workers would transition from other company roles, like sales, to manual labor on construction sites, according to Ortega.
“You can’t just relocate people as you please. That’s not how it works,” Ortega noted.
Given the country’s need for millions more homes, as various estimates suggest, losing any portion of the workforce responsible for building these homes would only exacerbate the housing crisis.
“Mass deportations would devastate the construction and housing markets,” Lukens remarked. “It would also severely impact the agricultural sector, cost a fortune, and wreak havoc on the economy. It’s simply unacceptable, both from a human and an economic standpoint,” he concluded.
—– MHProNews Note: the original of the above is found at this link here. —
Part II – Additional Information with Facts-Evidence-Analysis (FEA)
1) A word search of the post above by Carter doesn’t show any use of the word’s “supply” or “demand.” Yet, given that she is supposed to be “Editor-in-Chief” for “Economy and Finance,” how can such a basic “economics 101” type topics be left out of her narrative? To illustrate, consider this Q&A with left-leaning Bing’s AI powered Copilot. Note too that there is no statement in this post that indicates the remarks are editorial in nature. Rather, it is presented as “news” that per their website is “well-researched.”
2)
Copilot, I’m unpacking an article by an economics and finance editor. On the topic of making housing supply worse by mass deportations, she never uses the words supply and demand. She never cites a data point about how many migrants might be leaving if a successful deportation program occurred. While estimates vary on how many are in the U.S. illegally at this time, among the lower side estimates are 10 million. If there were 4 people per household, and some of those illegals are reportedly younger males who came without families, that might open up about 2.5 million housing units. Isn’t supply and demand part of proverbial economics 101? Doesn’t there have to be an accounting for the impact of housing units vacated, not just the loss of possible laborers, for a fair analysis?
In the context of mass deportations, the potential vacating of housing units would indeed affect the supply side of the equation. If 10 million undocumented immigrants were deported and 4 people per household vacated housing units, that could open up approximately 2.5 million housing units. This would increase the housing supply, which could potentially lower housing costs, assuming demand remains constant.
However, it’s also important to consider the impact on the labor force, as many undocumented immigrants work in construction and other sectors that affect housing supply. Removing these workers could lead to labor shortages and increased construction costs, which might offset any potential benefits from increased housing supply.
It seems like the article you’re unpacking might be missing some key economic analysis by not addressing these factors. Do you think a more comprehensive approach would provide a clearer picture of the potential impacts? …”
2) To begin to do a decent analysis of the impact of deporting migrants illegally in the U.S., population growth absent immigrants should be considered. With that in mind, MHProNews asked left-leaning Google‘s AI powered Gemini the following.
If immigration, legal or not, is not considered, how many live births vs. deaths are there in the U.S. in 2022 2023 and 2024?
- 2022: Approximately 3,667,758 live births and 3,270,000 deaths.
- 2023: Approximately 3,596,017 live births.
- This data excludes any impact of immigration, legal or illegal.
- The number of births in 2023 is slightly lower than in 2022.
- The data source for this information is the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics. …”
3) Based on that data in Part II #2 above, the native-born U.S. population has gone into negative growth. American citizens and those legally in the U.S. are competing against those illegally here. That is an economic and practical reality that goes entirely unaddressed by Carter for The Northern Front. MHProNews asked Copilot to double check the above.
Copilot, citing CDC data, Google’s Gemini said the following: “According to CDC data, in the U.S., there were significantly more deaths than live births in both 2022 and 2023, with 2023 seeing a slightly lower number of births compared to 2022: 2022: Approximately 3,667,758 live births and 3,270,000 deaths. 2023: Approximately 3,596,017 live births. Key points to remember: This data excludes any impact of immigration, legal or illegal. The number of births in 2023 is slightly lower than in 2022. The data source for this information is the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics. …” Can you confirm or clarify that data as accurate or not?
4) MHProNews is known to be a critic of Clayton Homes and the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI). That said, this may be an example of MHProNews agreeing with a remark made by Lesli Gooch, as cited by Carter in The Northern Forum. Ironically, Carter’s narrative begins to fall apart due to some of its own internal claims. While the NAHB, per Carter, said deporting workers would disrupt workforces, MHI said not so for manufactured housing. While MHI is arguably posturing, given their apparent support for Democratic policies, nevertheless, CEO Gooch’s remarks on its face are acceptable and rational in this instance.
Per Carter, MHI’s CEO Gooch said: “MHI is not concerned about President-elect Trump’s intention to uphold the nation’s immigration laws. Our factories and workers adhere to these laws, and we look forward to playing a key role in tackling the national housing shortage,” Gooch stated.”
5)
Useful. Okay, here is the article by Alice Carter that I’m fisking https://northernforum.net/mass-deportations-could-worsen-the-uss-severe-housing-shortage/ She is listed as Editor in Chief for Economy and Finance at the Northern Forum. She makes nor references any such calculation in her article, isn’t that correct? If someone is doing an article on the impact of mass deportations, and they have expertise in economics, then isn’t part of the equation how many births vs. deaths there are in the U.S. and what that means for housing supply and demand? At a glance, it would appear that if the native born, naturalized, and legal immigrant births in the U.S. are less than replacement rate, than part of the demand side of the equation for U.S. housing is ironically the need to provide housing for those coming into the country illegally, isn’t that logically correct? While there are other factors impacting supply and demand, because millions of young adult Americans reportedly moved back in with parents in recent years due to escalating housing costs and a lack of affordable housing, on its face shutting down illegal immigration coupled with mass deportations may help ease the housing crisis, correct? I’ve seen a report that legal immigration under Trump may be reduced to around 750,000 a year. The current pace of legal immigration into the U.S. is about a million souls a year. So, there would still be some need for new housing, even if illegal immigration was shut down and mass deportations occurred, right? While this is controversial, and obviously impacts real people, let’s look at the pure math of this. Confirm or clarify as needed.
Regarding your points on the housing supply and demand equation, it’s true that the number of births versus deaths in the U.S. can impact housing demand. If the native-born, naturalized, and legal immigrant births are below the replacement rate, it could mean that part of the housing demand is driven by the need to accommodate those entering the country illegally.
Shutting down illegal immigration and implementing mass deportations could potentially ease the housing crisis by reducing the demand for housing. However, it’s important to note that this is a complex issue with many factors at play. For example, mass deportations could also lead to a shortage of construction workers, which would negatively impact the housing supply.
Under Trump’s administration, legal immigration was indeed reduced, with net immigration figures showing a significant decrease during his term. The current pace of legal immigration is about a million people per year. Even with a reduction in illegal immigration and mass deportations, there would still be a need for new housing to accommodate legal immigrants and the existing population.
So, while the pure math might suggest that reducing illegal immigration could ease the housing crisis, the reality is more nuanced and involves multiple economic and social factors.
: USA TODAY : SFGate : MSN : Northern Forum : National Immigration Forum : Visual Capitalist : U.S. News & World Report : FactCheck.org…”
6) The next follow up in the chat thread clarifies the issues raised by Copilot and Carter. Note two typos and a missing hyphen were corrected in what follows. Despite those, Copilot grasped the question correctly.
Agreed, this is a topic with numerous moving parts, and while Fact Check and some sources dispute GOP and the incoming Trump Administration arguments, isn’t it also fair to say that there are sources that agree with Trump and Republicans who back his stance on mass deportations? That said, my focus is an analysis of Alice Carter’s article. It seems to me that she has self-contradictory statements even in her own article. For example, per Carter, Lesli Gooch at the Manufactured Housing Institute stated: ” “MHI is not concerned about President-elect Trump’s intention to uphold the nation’s immigration laws. Our factories and workers adhere to these laws, and we look forward to playing a key role in tackling the national housing shortage,” Gooch stated.” Carter also said the NAHB doesn’t know what percentage of illegals make up their association’s workforce: “The report also reveals that immigrants compose 25% of the overall construction workforce, and nearly one-third of those in construction trades. However, Wingert noted that the association does not have data on how many of these workers are in the country legally.” Carter also said: ““Mass deportations would devastate the construction and housing markets,” Lukens remarked. “It would also severely impact the agricultural sector, cost a fortune, and wreak havoc on the economy. It’s simply unacceptable, both from a human and an economic standpoint,” he concluded.” Taking the remarks at face value, while the NAHB may say that it would hurt their builders, if MHI is asserting that their employees building manufactured homes have legal status and deportations won’t hurt manufactured housing, then hasn’t Carter contradicted her own conclusion? Carter wrote: “Given the country’s need for millions more homes, as various estimates suggest, losing any portion of the workforce responsible for building these homes would only exacerbate the housing crisis.” Because manufactured housing can meet the needs of those coming legally, and because deportations would open up housing supply, isn’t there an evidence-based argument to be made that Carter’s thesis is both self-contradictory and lacking in important facts that could lead to incorrect conclusions, because several supply and demand factors are ignored?
Given these conflicting statements, it appears that Carter’s article may indeed lack consistency. If MHI’s employees are legally in the country and deportations would not hurt manufactured housing, then Carter’s conclusion that losing any portion of the workforce responsible for building homes would exacerbate the housing crisis seems contradictory.
Furthermore, as you pointed out, if the native-born, naturalized, and legal immigrant births are below the replacement rate, and deportations would open up housing supply, there is an evidence-based argument to be made that Carter’s thesis may be lacking in important facts and could lead to incorrect conclusions.
It’s essential to consider all factors impacting supply and demand, including the role of legal and illegal immigration, the availability of affordable housing, and the overall economic impact of mass deportations. While Carter’s article raises valid concerns, it may benefit from a more comprehensive analysis of these factors to provide a clearer picture of the situation. …”
7) One more follow up with Copilot completes this focused (as opposed to exhaustive) analysis.
I would largely agree. But to clarify the point, Carter fails to mention key factors that are considered economics 101, right? She doesn’t take into account that deportations would obviously open up available housing. Carter also fails to account for the point that while mass deportations may hurt conventional builders who may be using illegal immigrant labor, it supposedly won’t hurt manufactured housing industry builders who the Manufactured Housing Institute’s Lesli Gooch asserts are always legal employees, right? While the immigration issue is fraught with emotion and controversy, my point is more simple. Carter has crafted a narrative that is self-contradictory in places, and ignores other factors necessary to come to the conclusion that she drew. Namely: “Given the country’s need for millions more homes, as various estimates suggest, losing any portion of the workforce responsible for building these homes would only exacerbate the housing crisis.” Indeed, there is an argument to be made that Carter was editorializing in an article that is being presented as straight news, right? So, there are several journalistic and logical weaknesses to her post, correct?
Carter’s narrative appears to be self-contradictory and lacks consideration of key factors necessary for a comprehensive analysis. Her conclusion that losing any portion of the workforce responsible for building homes would exacerbate the housing crisis doesn’t account for the potential benefits of opening up housing supply through deportations.
It does seem that Carter’s article may be more editorial in nature, presenting a specific narrative rather than a balanced analysis. This could be seen as a journalistic and logical weakness, as it fails to provide a complete picture of the situation and ignores important factors that could lead to different conclusions. …”
8) Mark your calendar. MHProNews has editorially agreed with MHI, at least superficially, on this topic raised by Carter via her post on The Northern Forum. Never let it be justly said that we fail to give credit where and when it is due. But for first-time readers, MHI’s remarks should be taken with the items linked here and here in mind. Clayton’s remarks should be seen through the lens of articles linked here. Keep in mind that Warren Buffett in the 2024 election didn’t formally endorse Kamala Harris as did his ally, William “Bill” Gates III.
9) MHProNews hereby calls upon the Northern Front to modify or pull the article posted above. Why? Because they state on their meet our team page the following.
“At THE NORTHERN FORUM, our editorial team is dedicated to delivering accurate, well-researched, and engaging content across various topics, from economy and finance to trending news and daily life. With a passion for journalism and a commitment to transparency, our team ensures that you receive the most relevant and reliable news.” They are asserting well researched and accurate reporting, but the fisking above reveals that was simply not so. If this article was so flawed, how about others that may be politically charged?
Don’t miss today’s postscript.
With no further adieu, here are the headlines for the week in review, from 11.10 to 11.17.2024.
Part III – MHVille Weekly Headlines in Review
What’s New from MHLivingNews
What’s New from Washington, D.C. from MHARR
What’s the Latest from Tim Connor, CSP, on the Words of Wisdom
What’s New on the Series by L. A. “Tony” Kovach on the Patch
-
Richard Blakley-Let’s play Clue to Determine Cause of Democrats’ Loss ‘Was it Nancy, with a knife-in-the-back relationship, in the White House?’ Was it the Lady on ABC’s The View? Was it George Clooney? DNC? |
-
The Creepy Line-Peter Schweizer-Dr. Jordan Peterson-Dr. Robert Epstein Acclaimed “The Creepy Line” Documentary Reveals Manipulation by Google and Facebook Impacting Most in U.S. Google since ruled a monopoly.
| -
‘MAKE AMERICA HEALTHY AGAIN’ RFK Jr. for Health and Human Services Controversial figure was touted as a “star” by prior President Barack Obama when he was president elect and wanted Robert Kennedy Jr. for…
-
Movie Buffs – Movie Classic – “Enemy of the State” – Lessons Learned A movie can be fictional yet can still convey insights and ideas grounded in reality that may help us better understand our world today.
-
“There is a Hero in All of Us”-Bobby Charles ex-Ast Secretary of State “Nailing Jello to the Wall is Hard,” said Robert Charles to AMAC members, adding: “Washington, D.C. is a World of Mirrors and Deception.”
-
Secret State Miniseries – Fictional TV Series Shed Light on Reality Four-part political thriller stars Gabriel Byrne, Charles Dance & Gina McKee probes democracy, big business, military-industrial-spy complex
-
Floridians Among Trump Transition Team Announced Admin Appointees Several Controversial Picks Stir Media and Pundits Across Left-Right Divide – Facts, Insights, Analysis – “Donald the Disruptor” 2.0 Coming
-
Trump Transition Team Asked to Prioritize Affordable Housing Issues National Trade Group Asks President-Elect Donald Trump Transition Team to Prioritize Biden-Harris Reg that Threatens Housing Affordability.
-
Good Political Cartoons Can Speak Volumes-Educate-Inform at a Glance A Choice and Not an Echo is just one of the political cartoons shared via this post for the Patch.
-
Hawley: Probe-Prosecute FEMA Staff for Trump Supporter Discrimination Senator Josh Hawley (MO-R) Call for Full-Scale Investigation & Prosecution of FEMA Discrimination Hurricane Milton Victims With Trump Signs
-
People=Policy: Rick Scott-John Cornyn-John Thune Swap for McConnell? ‘People are policy’ mantra for pragmatic mechanics of governing following any election. 3 GOP candidates to replace Mitch McConnell.
-
Veterans Day and U.S. Marine Corps Founding Facts & Reflections 11.10.2024 was the 248th anniversary of the establishment of the U.S. Marine Corps. 11.11.2024 is Veterans Day. Insights on both events.
-
Shock! Country Moves to Lower Age of Consent for Girls to 9 Years Old European & Other National Leaders Explore Stunning Announcement as Part of Potentially Broader Trend to Push Girl’s ‘Consent’ to Younger Age
The entire series on the Patch can be accessed at this link here.
What’s New on the Daily Business News on MHProNews
Saturday 11.16.2024
Friday 11.15.2024
Thursday 11.14.2024
Wednesday 11.13.2024
Tuesday 11.12.2024
Monday 11.11.2024
Sunday 11.10.2024
Postscript
1) An outreach to Alice Carter via The Northern Front did not receive a formal reply. In fairness, it was pre-dawn and a Sunday, among other factors. But her article was apparently posted on a Saturday, 11.16.2024, and she is listed as Editor in Chief for Economy and Finance.
2) Also in fairness, Carter’s arguably flawed post is a good example of why free speech and debate are necessary and useful. Carter attempted to make the case that deportations will hurt the housing crisis, or as she put it: “Given the country’s need for millions more homes, as various estimates suggest, losing any portion of the workforce responsible for building these homes would only exacerbate the housing crisis.” That may be a useful claim to those opposing Trump’s deportations, but her article missed several key facts which is why that conclusion is apparently flawed.
3) But there are other oversights in her post that are ignored and were not dealt with in the Part II analysis by MHProNews above. For example. When a company or operation knowingly hires illegal immigrants, that too is a violation of federal law. Per JS Berry Law: “Title 8 U.S.C §1324 a(a)(1)(A) makes it unlawful for any person or entity to hire, recruit, or refer for a fee, for employment in the United States an undocumented worker.” The Center for Immigration Studies said: “Hiring Illegals Is a Crime.”
The Law Firm of Shihab & Associates said that the: Consequences of Employing Undocumented Workers.” “Fines for knowingly hiring undocumented workers can be up to $11,000 for each worker.” That site provided two examples, one of which included a developer: “An example of civil fines that happened within the last three years is the 2007 Ohio chicken plant raid that culminated in the arrest of certain supervisors of that factory and the ultimate imposition of a $536,000 fine. However, since 2006, the government shifted its efforts to prosecuting employers and charging them with criminal liability. For instance, in 2010, a Columbus, Ohio developer was sentenced to two years probation and fined in U.S. District Court in for routinely employing undocumented aliens in his properties.”
There are risks to hiring an illegal immigrant. No doubt, the Trump Administration will face an array of lawfare in an effort to stop or delay such an effort. But it won’t be surprising if targeting not only the illegal immigrants themselves, but also the employers who hire them, could result in serious consequences for employers. Time will tell, but employers, be aware.
4) MHProNews was apparently alone in MHVille reporting months before the election that mass deportations is the one thing that could result in a faster solution to the affordable housing crisis.
5) For Carter’s sake and that of others who may not realize that we fact check or “fisk” other people’s content regardless of their race, gender, or other possible categories, consider the examples below. István Dobozi is someone this writer for MHProNews has personally met at the nearby Magyar Club. He too makes an argument based on asserted economic wisdom. His background is impressive, yet some arguments he made in articles in often prestigious publications was apparently flawed. We exposed those weaknesses more than once, one example is shown below.
6) Several possibilities exist that may explain why a journalist, and/or economist, makes a flawed argument. It may be, for example, personal bias. It may be some economic incentive.
“Most economists are political apologists masquerading as economists,” wrote Doug Casey in one of his columns. When Carter opened her article with the words: “As Donald Trump gears up to assume the presidency and fulfill a major campaign pledge to deport immigrants,” the question must be asked. Why didn’t Carter show Trump’s title as president elect or as the 45th President of the United States (POTUS)? Did she think that stating that he was going to assume the presidency was sufficient? Whatever the case may be, it is at least a fair question, was she perhaps a supporter of some opponent of Trump? When Carter wrote the words “assume the presidency” is she a skeptic that he won the electoral contest against Kamala Harris (D) and other minor party candidates fairly? We do not know. But they are fair questions that may shed light on why, despite the apparent flaws revealed in Part II and in this postscript, that Carter’s article on the topic of “Mass Deportations Could Worsen the US’s Severe Housing Shortage.”
7) Using common-sense, the internal contents of her own article, and boosted by AI logic and evidence, this article demonstrates the weaknesses and flaws in her article. It may never have been brought to MHProNews attention had she not cited Clayton Homes or MHI. Again, MHVille readers should mark their calendars. MHI CEO Gooch’s remarks on the topic will be kept in mind, to see if they stay consistent. As to Carter, had she looked at last Sunday’s post on the topic of migrants and the housing crisis, she may have framed her article differently. There are more economic harms to American working class and middle-class members than just a lack of affordable housing. Nor did Carter’s article note that mass deportation was apparently popular with the majority of voters.
Programming Notice: stay tuned for what promises to be several news items with our classic FEA for manufactured housing “Industry News, Tips, and Views Pros Can Use” © where “We Provide, You Decide.” ©
BREAKING: Reports of large migrant caravan turning around after news of Trump victory. Self deportation is already happening pic.twitter.com/Q5kOF6EnH5
— TaraBull (@TaraBull808) November 8, 2024
They’re already self-pre-deporting.
WE ARE SO BACK!!!Migrant Caravan: Travelers Turn Back as Trump Win Ends ‘Dream of Getting Out’ – Newsweek https://t.co/vSQX6STa9Y
— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) November 8, 2024
Again, our thanks to free email subscribers and all readers like you, as well as our tipsters/sources, sponsors and God for making and keeping us the runaway number one source for authentic “News through the lens of manufactured homes and factory-built housing” © where “We Provide, You Decide.” © ## (Affordable housing, manufactured homes, reports, fact-checks, analysis, and commentary. Third-party images or content are provided under fair use guidelines for media.) See Related Reports, further below. Text/image boxes often are hot-linked to other reports that can be access by clicking on them.)
By L.A. “Tony” Kovach – for MHProNews.com.
Tony earned a journalism scholarship and earned numerous awards in history and in manufactured housing.
For example, he earned the prestigious Lottinville Award in history from the University of Oklahoma, where he studied history and business management. He’s a managing member and co-founder of LifeStyle Factory Homes, LLC, the parent company to MHProNews, and MHLivingNews.com.
This article reflects the LLC’s and/or the writer’s position and may or may not reflect the views of sponsors or supporters.
Connect on LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/latonykovach
Related References:
The text/image boxes below are linked to other reports, which can be accessed by clicking on them.’
