Stating the obvious can clarify issues. Our profession is a subset of the greater American economy. The economy, like it or not, is influenced by political decisions. In the age of COVID19, political decisions related to ‘health’ and ‘public safety’ have taken on a meaning that many would never have dreamt about just one short year ago. The handling of the pandemic has and is causing massive disruption in our economy and thus our profession. Thus, a reality check – news and analysis – on what is being discerned in an age when disinformation, misdirection, and deception seem to dominate over truth is warranted.

Because what numbers call the coronavirus “pandemic,” which some medical and other experts admit is a potentially lethal virus, nevertheless question how this event has been dealt with. Experts that will be cited below note that when measured as a percentage of the population, this coronavirus is not as deadly as many may have been led to believe by virtue of nearly nonstop counts of infections. The fatality rate is low, say large numbers of medical and other experts. So, when literally trillions of dollars are flowing – who is benefiting from those dollars? Who are being harmed? Why isn’t “focused protection” being promoted more than it has been?

The medical professionals – literally thousands! – cited below said this: “We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza.” They advocated for “focused protection.”

What is the truth about this global event one year in? What should people think a land that seems to be dominated by liars, urban legends, costly and deadly fabrications?

“As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls,” said those medical and scientific professionals cited further below.

Additionally, who is profiting from this “pandemic” which some have and are calling a “plandemic” or “scamdemic” – and not because the virus isn’t real. The virus is real. It can kill. But the data reflects that the mortality rate from COVID19 is low. If this coronavirus that originated in Wuhan, China proves to be little more than the mortality rate of some seasonal flu virus, was it smart to shut down large parts of the U.S. – or other national economies – to “combat” COVID19?

“The most compassionate approach” said the medical professionals cited below “balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity…” They spoke about vaccines, but these scientists and medical professionals from around the world also made it clear that they did not think that the solution was vaccine dependent. “Focused protection” was their sage advice, and the wisdom of their insights are ever-clearer in hindsight. Those experts added, “Those who are not [as] vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal. Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home when sick should be practiced by everyone to reduce the herd immunity threshold.”

 

NPR and Others…

NPR’s headline on March 1, 2021 would find widespread agreement across the left-right divide: “Disinformation Fuels Distrust At All Levels Of Government.”

But that NPR report itself would be highly divisive and largely seen as partisan in nature. Nevertheless, it is difficult to dispute that headline point that “Disinformation Fuels Distrust At All Levels Of Government.” Indeed, a question should connected to that statement deserves to be asked. Shouldn’t disinformation – when it is fostered by public officials – lead to “distrust” of “all levels of government?” When disinformation is spread as authentic, why would objective thinkers want to trust a source that is deliberately misinforming others?

Then, that begs a follow up question. Who is spreading that disinformation and for who’s benefit?

MHProNews will first review some previous information, because it sheds light on the questions and topics above. Then, new insights will be presented. All of these are from third-party sources, so these are not our ‘opinions.’ Many of these insights are from medical professionals who have publicly disputed what might be called the ‘official narrative’ that many mainstream or social media, tech giants, corporate interests, certain billionaires, and their political allies are for whatever reason protecting.

Note that there will be evidence- and reason-based hits on numbers of leading Democrats, but also on President Trump and some of his political loyalists uncovered by this exploration. Put differently, the facts and evidence will make many uncomfortable. But that is unavoidable. Seeking the truth or ‘reality checks’ ought not to be about arriving at some pre-determined end point that happens to fit a partisan agenda.

With those predicates, the following should prove revealing and useful.

 

Part I. Recap of Known Concerns from Named, Respectable National and International Sources About COVID19 Handling and Information

MHProNews has previously reported on the Great Barrington Declaration by thousands of medical and scientific professionals in some 47 languages. It is worth reviewing what those professionals said.

 The Great Barrington Declaration

The Great Barrington Declaration – As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.

Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice.

Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed.

Fortunately, our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza.

As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e.  the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity.

The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection.

Adopting measures to protect the vulnerable should be the central aim of public health responses to COVID-19. By way of example, nursing homes should use staff with acquired immunity and perform frequent testing of other staff and all visitors. Staff rotation should be minimized. Retired people living at home should have groceries and other essentials delivered to their home. When possible, they should meet family members outside rather than inside. A comprehensive and detailed list of measures, including approaches to multi-generational households, can be implemented, and is well within the scope and capability of public health professionals.

Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal. Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home when sick should be practiced by everyone to reduce the herd immunity threshold. Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home. Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.

On October 4, 2020, this declaration was authored and signed in Great Barrington, United States, by:

Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, a biostatistician, and epidemiologist with expertise in detecting and monitoring infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations.

Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases.

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert focusing on infectious diseases and vulnerable populations.

##

 

Part II Insights and Timelines That Have Pragmatic Value for Professionals and Others

MHProNews notes that it may very well be that some medical professional in your area, or that you personally know, is among the signers of this historic document.  Notice that this was about 1 month before the 2020 election. 5 months have elapsed since the date this was initially published. Why is this so little known?

There are many possible answers. But the words of the late Senator William Proxmire (WI-D). Proxmire said that people should follow the money and recognize that there are no coincidences in Washington, D.C. Per Wikipedia, Senator Proxmire gave once monthly “The Golden Fleece Award (1975–1988) was a tongue-in-cheek award given to public officials in the United States for their squandering of public money…” Yes, there was a time when public officials from both major parties thought that wasting public or ‘government’ money was wrong. In fairness, there are still public officials from both major parties that seem to still express that viewpoint. Prudence is not dead, it is merely drowned out a dizzying array of deficit spending. While Wall Street may cheer such largess of the public’s money with ever-higher stock prices, it must not be overlooked that the gas pumps, utilities, food, commodities, and other prices are going up too.

While massive, only a small fraction of the $1.9 trillion bill signed into law this week under the guise of COVID19 relief and the so-called “American Rescue Plan of 2021” actually goes to the people. Who is seeking to fool whom?

As a brief related segue, there are those periodic messages from readers that think that MHProNews covers too many ‘political’ topics or issues that do not seem to be directly connected to affordable manufactured homes. In as much as the concern is raised, it merits a response. As was noted at the top, affordable housing is a subset of the American economy. Manufactured homes are a subset of affordable housing. Politics – like it or not – impacts our economy and thus our industry. Furthermore, regulatory and legal schemes impact our society, the population, and thus once again influence our industry. Some time ago, MHProNews adapted another tag line to compliment the prior one. “News through the lens of manufactured homes and factory-built housing.”© We added that “We Provide, You Decide.”© Our logo bears an early tag line “Industry News, Tips, and Views Pros Can Use”© that was also often followed by where “We Provide, You Decide.”© Rephrased, we have long made clear that we provide a mix of news, tips (advice), and views that aim to inform professionals and other readers. By unlike a mere blog or opinion site, our news elements routinely credits the sources and then our analysis helps readers discern what that might mean for them and their professional interests.

That said, let’s circle back to COVID19.

It is not just the scientists, medical, and public health professionals who have raised concerns about how COVID19 has been peddled to the public. A now former public official in Australia, Sanjeev Sabholok that MHProNews has also previously reported on, made these statistical statements that line up with what the signers of the Great Barrington Declaration said over 5 months ago. These are objectively interconnected pieces of a puzzle.

 

The entire video those quotes are taken from yields several eye-popping data points and highly-charged accusations made by that professional. It is a reminder that the blizzard of fibs, fables, and fabrications are not limited to the USA.  That point will be important further below. Note, that the statement in the video below, that this is ‘not a pandemic’ should be understood in this sense. Compared to the Spanish Flu, this is a serious viral outbreak.  Neither the host Alex Jones nor Sanjeev Sabholok said that the virus isn’t deadly. Rather, when considered point by point, they make the argument that how this viral outbreak has been dealt with has been flawed nearly from the outset.

 

 

With that background, MHProNews has more recently introduced concerns raised by self-proclaimed lifelong Democrat Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (RFK Jr.) That son of the assassinated Senator Robert F. “Bobby” Kennedy” and the nephew of publicly murdered President John F. Kennedy is a liberal who is willing to question the left as well as the right. RFK Jr does so based upon evidence and reason. As a successful attorney and advocate, RFK Jr. has pointed the finger directly at billionaires such as Bill Gates. While Kennedy does not stress the connection, Gates is the well-known, longtime associate of Warren Buffett. Warren Buffett is the chairman of publicly traded Berkshire Hathaway (BRK). Berkshire owns Clayton Homes, 21^st Mortgage Corp, Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, and numerous other interests that involve or have touch-points with manufactured housing.

 

 

It is not just RFK who from a liberal viewpoint has questioned the motivations of several uber-billionaires on the political left.

 

 

 

So far, that outline seems to strike more at the Democratic donor-base and many contemporary Democratic political views that ironically have drifted far from where the late President John F. Kennedy had their party. Here is where questions need to be raised about President Donald J. Trump. While this publication publicly supported, and would do so again given the same circumstances, the 45^th President, nevertheless that does not mean that all that President Trump did was perfect or ideal.  The case can be made – as the late Rush Limbaugh suggested – that President Trump “got rolled.” Limbaugh, and other Trump supporters was willing to speak out a times when the 45^th President or “Republicans” and their supporters “got rolled.”

 

The illustration from a Google search above this date is instructive. Confidence appeals to many. Arrogance is a turn off to others. There is often a fine-line between arrogance and confidence.

 

 

Despite what award-winning liberal attorney-turned journalist Greenwald has aptly termed a “blinding propaganda” by media that is dominated from billionaires and their corporate, media, and political allies and interests, it is an entirely open question if the vaccines were a good decision. The economic shut down clearly turned out to be a problematic decision that likely cost President Trump the retention of the White House. Even for those who believe in the substantial evidence of voter fraud, one must go back prior to that purported fraud and ask – how was it carried out? What made that disputed election result possible?

Short answer? Even many Democrats and their media supporters say it is COVID19. Left-leaning and anti-Trump Time said: “The coronavirus pandemic has changed the way we campaign, how we vote and what we value.” That was August 6, 2020. On September 29, 2020, left-leaning CNBC said that “The coronavirus pandemic has fundamentally changed the 2020 presidential campaign, particularly the money race.”

From both the left and right, there are admission that without COVID19, there would not have been millions of ballots by mail. Even if the majority of those mailed ballots were legitimate, percentage-wise it did not require too many ballots to upend the election result.

MHLivingNews carefully documented in a report published on 05/19/2020 how ABC News had reported on leaks from U.S. intelligence services circa November 2019. American intelligence was already aware of the coronavirus that apparently escaped from a bio-weapons level 4 lab in Wuhan, China. The Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) had clear ties to several American entities, including governmental, nonprofits, corporate, and health interests. Not only did the World Health Organization arguably ‘blow it,’ but so too did American intelligence. President Trump, per leaked mainstream media reports, was not personally advised until sometime in January 2020 about the possible threat of the Wuhan-originated coronavirus. Much more is in the report linked below.

 

 

In hindsight, there is an evidence-based argument to be made that President Trump was kept in the dark for weeks if not months. What follows should be sobering to not just Trump supporters, but to all Americans who genuinely care about our nation and its future.

 

Based on known reporting,

• Perhaps as early as August 2019, there are indications that the virus was spreading in Wuhan, China.
• There were pandemic drills in the U.S. in August 2019 dubbed Crimson Contagion.
• The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201 in October 2019. That too was a pandemic preparedness drill, per their own website.
• Circa November, 2019, U.S. intelligence is ‘aware’ of the spreading Wuhan virus, per ABC News. Given other research that has since emerged that makes it plain that satellite images reflected possible viral spread that drove up hospitalization in Wuhan in the fall of 2019, it is an open question if U.S. intelligence knew earlier than this date.
• On December 4, 2019, Congressional hearings that included a discussion on Crimson Contagion where held. Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR) at the Department of Health and Human Services were at that hearing. Anthony S. Fauci., M.D. and Director Robert P. Kadlec, M.D., M.T.M.&H., M.S. testified to a bipartisan committee.

 

There are several possible evidence- and reason-based takeaways from even that initial timeline. In no particular order of importance.

• The U.S. Government spends billions of dollars every year on intelligence or “spy services” that include medical intelligence. That is spent precisely to avoid or mitigate the threat of a pandemic.
• That implies that there was a costly failure by intelligence services.
• There was also a failure by public health services. There is ample evidence of Dr. Anthony Fauci, for example, contradicting himself at several times over the course of roughly 16 months in public statements. Why he is given credibility at all is suspect.
• Months before the Great Barrington Declaration, MHLivingNews made the comparison to how the Hong Kong Flu was handled vs. how the COVID19 ‘pandemic’ was dealt with. The clear takeaway was and remains that there were no mass lockdowns in 1968. By contrast, there were mass lockdowns in 2020 in the U.S. and nations around the world.
• As Oxfam and others have documented, the world’s top billionaires have profited wildly from this so-called ‘pandemic.’ Is that coincidence? Or did the policies being implemented benefit a few at great cost to the many?
• MHProNews reported on international health experts who just weeks after the “pandemic” was declared were questioning how the disease was being handled by public health officials.

Among the takeaways would be:

• When carefully curated information is properly presented, it stands the test of time.
• Accurate information, reporting, and analysis withstands partisan concerns.
• Those insights are useful to businesses, investors, professionals, as well as others.

 

Part III. The Under-Told Story – Adverse and Fatal Outcomes from COVID19 Vaccines

There are legal, moral, ethical, and pragmatic issues that arise beyond the question of who may have benefited or was harmed politically or financially from the handling of the COVID19 outbreak.

On 03/12/21 per the Defender and used with permission is the following.

 

Reports of Deaths After COVID Vaccines Up by 259 in 1 Week, CDC Data Show

Between Dec. 14, 2020, and Mar. 5, 2021, 31,079 reports of adverse events were submitted to VAERS, including 1,524 deaths, 5,507 serious injuries and 390 reports of Bell’s Palsy.

By Megan Redshaw

Data released today by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on the number of injuries and deaths reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) following COVID vaccines remain consistent with previous weeks, with the exception of a 31% spike in reports of Bell’s Palsy.

Every Friday, VAERS makes public all vaccine injury reports received by the system as of Friday of the previous week. Today’s data show that between Dec. 14, 2020, and March 5, a total of 31,079 total adverse events were reported to VAERS, including 1,524 deaths — an increase of 259 over the previous 7 days — and 5,507 serious injuries, up 1,083 over the same time period. In the U.S., 85.01 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of March 5.

VAERS is the primary mechanism for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed.

This week’s 31% increase in reports of Bell’s Palsy marks a break with past trends. Otherwise, today’s data reflect trends that have emerged since The Defender first began tracking VAERS reports related to COVID vaccines.

This week’s VAERS data show:

• Of the 1,524 deaths reported as of March 6, 30% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination, and 46% occurred in people who became ill within 48 hours of being vaccinated.
• Nineteen percent of deaths were related to cardiac disorders.
• Fifty-three percent of those who died were male, 45% were female and the remaining death reports did not include gender of the deceased.
• The average age of those who died was 77.9 and the youngest death confirmed was a 23-year-old.
• As of March 5, 265 pregnant women had reported adverse events related to COVID vaccines, including 85 reports of miscarriage or premature birth. None of the COVID vaccines approved for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) have been tested for safety or efficacy in pregnant women.
• There were 1,689 reports of anaphylaxis, with 59% of cases attributed to the Pfizer-Bio-N-Tech vaccine and 41% to Moderna.

The first Johnson & Johnson COVID vaccine was administered in the U.S. on March 2. As of March 5, two adverse events related to the vaccine had been reported to VAERS. Both occurred in young people, and the reactions included tongue tingling and numbness, hot flashes, headache and extreme fatigue.

On March 10, The Defender reported the death of a 39-year-old woman who died four days after receiving a second dose of Moderna’s COVID vaccine. Kassidi Kurill died of organ failure after her liver, heart and kidneys shut down. She had no known medical issues or pre-existing conditions, family members said. An autopsy was ordered, but Dr. Erik Christensen, Utah’s chief medical examiner, said proving vaccine injury as a cause of death almost never happens.

Last month The Defender reported that a 58-year-old woman died hours after getting her first dose of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine. State and federal officials said they were investigating her death but did not perform an autopsy. A public records request revealed emails between State Health Commissioner Normal Oliver and public information officers that suggest officials were “concerned the death of Keyes, who is Black, could worsen vaccine hesitancy among minorities,” reported The Virginian Pilot.

State officials refused to answer how medical examiners could thoroughly rule out other potential causes of death triggered by or linked to the shot without an internal examination of the body.

The family was forced to get their own private autopsy. Keyes’ daughter said that even before state officials had her mother’s postmortem preliminary test results, the medical examiner’s office told her they would not perform an autopsy. They told her “nothing could be gleaned from an autopsy that would relate the vaccine to her death.”

On March 11, Denmark, Norway and Iceland announced they were joining other European countries in temporarily suspending use of the AstraZeneca-Oxford COVID vaccine following reports of blood clots in people who got the vaccine, The Defender reported. The Danish decision came days after Austrian authorities suspended a batch of AstraZeneca’s COVID vaccine while investigating the death of one person and the illness of another after receiving the shots. The same batch used in Austria was used in Denmark, according to Reuters.

On March 9, Australian Health Minister Greg Hunt was hospitalized two days after taking AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine. He received antibiotics and fluid. A link to the vaccine was ruled out, reported Reuters.

The AstraZeneca vaccine has not been cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for Emergency Use Authorization, but the drugmaker said last week it plans to apply soon.

Meanwhile, Pfizer is gearing up to protect itself from any financial risk associated with vaccine injuries in those countries where, unlike in the U.S., there are no laws in place to indemnify the vaccine maker against liability for injuries.

As reported by The Defender on March 9, Pfizer is demanding countries put up sovereign assets as collateral for expected vaccine injury lawsuits resulting from its COVID-19 inoculation after Argentina rejected Pfizer’s request to enact legislation indemnifying the company from liability for injuries. Pfizer wanted Argentina and Brazil to guarantee the company would be compensated for any expenses resulting from injury lawsuits against it.

Pfizer demanded Brazil waive sovereignty of its assets abroad in favor of Pfizer, not apply its domestic laws to the country, not penalize Pfizer for vaccine delivery delays and exempt Pfizer from all civil liability for COVID vaccine side effects. Brazil rejected Pfizer’s demands, calling them “abusive.”

Nine other South American countries have reportedly negotiated deals with Pfizer. It’s unclear whether they actually ended up giving up national assets in return.

In the U.S., vaccine makers already enjoy full indemnity against injuries occurring from this or any other pandemic vaccine under the PREP Act. COVID vaccine injury claims are filed with the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP), which is funded by U.S. taxpayers. The CICP is administered within the Department of Health and Human Services, which also sponsors the COVID-19 vaccination program.

On March 8, the CDC released new guidelines on how those “fully vaccinated” against COVID could gather with others. According to CNN, the level of precautions taken are determined by the characteristics of unvaccinated people. Fully vaccinated people can visit with other vaccinated people indoors without masks or social distancing, and can visit indoors with unvaccinated people from a single household without masks or physical distancing if the unvaccinated people are at low risk for severe disease.

Children’s Health Defense asks anyone who has experienced an adverse reaction, to any vaccine, to file a report following these three steps. ##

Megan Redshaw, J.D., is a freelance reporter for The Defender. She has a background in political science, a law degree and extensive training in natural health. “Reports of Deaths After COVID Vaccines Up by 259 in 1 Week, CDC Data Show” © 03/12/21 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense?  Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts. 

###

 

Part IV. Additional Information, more MHProNews Analysis, Commentary, and Conclusion

MHProNews sources and curates information from an array of sources including mainstream media, but also from operations like CHD’s the Defender which has proven on numerous occasions to be thoughtful, well researched, properly documented, and thus reliable. This reports and others is such a case.

But in a land of manipulated information that is increasingly being tossed into an ominously Orwellian memory hole by being censored, shadow banned, or deplatformed – those behaviors beg obvious questions. The first should always be Cui bono? Who benefits? Who is gaining from such censorship? Who is being harmed?

Journalists are supposed to probe topics with answering these thoughts in mind. Who, what, when, where, why, how, and how much. That could have been answered in this report and analysis with greater brevity. But the cost of doing that is eliminating information that helps ground the importance of the insights. When ‘fake news’ or other brief slurs are cast with abandon, it is precisely more thoughtful lengths and detailed reports with common sense analysis that help avoid merely partisan responses.

Not every report on MHProNews or our MHLivingNews sister site goes viral. But numerous ones have. They include topics that are industry specific. But they also include topics like those shown in the screen captures of Google searches that are more general in nature, yet shed light on policies and practices that are impacting our profession and others.

The sobering reality, like it or not, is this. Several of the investments made by Bill Gates, his foundation – which includes Warren Buffett as a trustee and major donor – and others often lead back to the same cast of characters and corporate interests. That’s not happenstance or conspiracy theory. That is reality. Thoughtful people must ask, is it coincidence? Or is there more to be discerned by this repeating pattern?

The late Senator Proxmire’s insights and “Golden Fleece” award are reminders that some of these patterns began decades ago.

 

 

History is relevant because whatever has happened before can happen again. If RFK Jr and others like him are correct, then his uncle and father where assassinated by powerful interests. Those interests have ties to government agencies.

 

 

If they are correct, then there has already been more than one clear case of U.S. election tampering – and an assassination that amounts to a coup – that in the 1960s resulted in two questionable if not illegal changes of power.

 

 

If the late Limbaugh and others are correct, President Trump trusted people he should not have trusted with respect to COVID19. Limbaugh said the president got “rolled.” Limbaugh said that not to disparage President Trump, but rather to tell it as he knew it to be.

There are legal, moral, and ethical concerns about the COVID19 vaccine. They include, but are not limited to the fact that the development used abortion-procedure connected research. While some – including leading Catholic figures who often take a dim view of such practices – have said that this vaccine is okay, there are others who strongly dispute that claim. But what this report, timeline, and linked insights should be questioning is not limited to the risks of the vaccine. It should not be limited to the often deadly or debilitating adverse outcomes from taking the vaccine, per the federal government’s own data. Nor is it limited to the costly policies that placed America in this tragic scenario.

 

 

The Hong Kong flu was not handled the same way as COVID19. The Spanish Flu from over a century ago was far deadlier, which is why it as a pandemic. While this health event is a significant viral outbreak – it is more like a seasonal flu. The nation has never previously shut down due to a flu virus. Thus, the Great Barrington Declaration that focused protection should have been the plan.

The fact that the WEF was involved in Event 201 should raise eyebrows on their connection to the so-called Great Reset.

 

A dark cloud this is emerging from these facts is this. The rapidly growing debt and economic disruption are yielding starkly higher levels of poverty.

 

 

Certain billionaires, corporate interests and their Iron Triangle related parties are benefiting from this pattern. Meanwhile, much of the country and over a billion globally are suffering more as a consequence.

Thoughtful people who are examining the evidence are sounding the alarm that the Great Reset is being pushed now for specific reasons that benefit those same oligarchs.

Ignoring these developments is to ignore risks to your personal wealth and professional interests. Ignoring these facts is to risk the freedom that has been protected by limiting government.

Nearly unlimited governmental power is anathema to the American Republic. The fact that this is serving a few only reinforces the notion that feudalism is rising.

If formalizing feudalism, the power of a ruling elite, and a not-so-great notion of a “reset” are the goal the cements the power of a few, that should be an alarm for all freedom loving people.

Last but not least in this reality check. When thinly disguised theft and transfers of wealth on a massive scale are occurring, these are additional reasons why sincere (as opposed to posturing) people from both major parties should expose what is occurring and break up those elites under antitrust, RICO, and other existing laws. Only by working to defend liberty and religious rights can the forces that are subverting our Republic be stopped.

 

 

 

 

 

Stay tuned for more of what is ‘behind the curtains’ as well as what is obvious and in your face reports. It is all here, at the runaway largest and most-read source for authentic manufactured home “News through the lens of manufactured homes and factory-built housing” © where “We Provide, You Decide.” © ## (Affordable housing, manufactured homes, reports, fact-checks, analysis, and commentary. Third-party images or content are provided under fair use guidelines for media.) (See Related Reports, further below. Text/image boxes often are hot-linked to other reports that can be access by clicking on them.)

By L.A. “Tony” Kovach – for MHProNews.com.

Tony earned a journalism scholarship and earned numerous awards in history and in manufactured housing.

For example, he earned the prestigious Lottinville Award in history from the University of Oklahoma, where he studied history and business management. He’s a managing member and co-founder of LifeStyle Factory Homes, LLC, the parent company to MHProNews, and MHLivingNews.com.

This article reflects the LLC’s and/or the writer’s position, and may or may not reflect the views of sponsors or supporters.

http://latonykovach.com

Connect on LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/latonykovach

 

Related References:

The text/image boxes below are linked to other reports, which can be accessed by clicking on them.